Districts have long been experiencing declining enrollment, infrastructure/facilities backlog, larger proportions of high-need students, costs increasing faster than funding, funding inequity, and wage stagnation.
But shorter-term trends, like ESSER, become an easy target for budget crunch blame, even if the math doesn't add up.
Let's contextualize that big headline-saturated number.
Does an extra ~$640 per student per year still feel transformational? In Allovue's 2022 national survey with the EdWeek Research Center, only 3% of teachers and administrators said pandemic aid was "transformational."
Distributions also varied widely between districts: the median amount was less than the average at just $467 per student per year.
Additionally, one public narrative seems to suggest that all ESSER dollars were used for recurring needs that have to be cut after 2024/2025. However, district CFOs understand the difference between baseline operating funds and one-time supplemental grant funding for emergency purposes.
Here's another way to look at it: If you get a 5% bonus, are you going to run out and buy a new house? Probably not. You understand that a bonus is a bonus and a salary is a salary.
Of course, some districts used ESSER dollars to help plug operational holes, like staving off layoffs. But the fact remains that the ESSER years did not cause most ongoing K-12 budget challenges.